Skip to content

TRACE · COMPLIANCE WORKFLOWS

Calls happen in the real world.
Evidence should fit the work.

Trace helps teams review AI and human calls, follow sensitive findings in context, and prepare a concise evidence handoff for the GRC workflow they already use.

A clear evidence path

01

Call

AI agent or human

02

Trace

Review and findings

03

Snapshot

Period-level summary

04

GRC workspace

Selected destination

05

Review

Control owner + auditor

A privacy-minimized handoff should use period-level summaries and integrity references. Reviewers can follow a specific finding in Trace when they need more context.

Choose your workspace

One evidence story, shaped for your workflow.

Start with the GRC destination your team already uses. Each guide shows where the evidence belongs, what a reviewer sees, and how to keep the audit trail legible.

A useful separation of jobs

Investigate in Trace. Organize the evidence in your GRC tool.

Call-level review and audit evidence serve different moments in the workflow. Trace gives the review team a place to inspect findings. The external snapshot gives control owners a compact view of coverage and patterns for a reporting period.

Legal + compliance

Follow the rule to the call

Review disclosure, consent and handling rules against the conversations they apply to.

Security + privacy

Keep sensitive detail in context

Use redacted findings for investigation while period-level handoffs keep raw call content out by default.

Operations + finance

Turn patterns into action

Give quality, contact-center and finance teams a shared view of review coverage and recurring gaps.

A small detail with a big effect

A receipt confirms delivery. A reviewer confirms meaning.

The handoff records where evidence went and when it arrived. Your control owner and auditor use their own workflow to decide whether it answers the control or test question. That gives teams a traceable process without confusing a successful upload with a compliance decision.

The delivery record

Destination, reporting period, transfer status and integrity references make the handoff easy to follow.

The human review

The evidence sits beside the selected document, control or test, where your reviewer can assess it with the policy and audit context.

Questions teams ask

What is in the planned evidence handoff?

The recommended minimized handoff includes calls reviewed, verdict totals, rule-hit counts, and integrity references. Keep raw recordings, full transcripts, caller identifiers, and per-call IDs in approved systems, and share them only when the review requires it.

Does the platform decide whether a call complied?

Trace reports observed findings against its configured rules. A selected GRC destination can store the evidence in your workflow, while your team and auditor decide how it supports a control or test.

How do Vanta, Drata, and Secureframe differ in this workflow?

Your team selects the destination that fits its existing process: a Vanta document, a Drata control, or a Secureframe test. The evidence stays tied to the review context your team chose.

Do I need to change my calling platform?

No. Trace is a call-review layer. It can work with submitted calls from an existing voice-agent or contact-center stack.

Are these provider workflows available in every workspace?

The pages explain customer-authorized evidence flows based on each provider’s published API. Ask PyAI about current connection availability for your workspace before planning scheduled delivery.

Continue exploring

Make your call review useful to the whole team.

See how Trace reviews calls, then use the compliance field guide to plan your rules and evidence loop.